Showing posts with label indie publishing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label indie publishing. Show all posts

Sunday, 28 April 2013

So you've written literary fiction?

Literary Fiction
I know quite a few writers. A great many of these are busy writing their first book or hunting down an agent, having finished the first book.

When I'm talking to these writers about their work or the genre they are writing within, the phrase 'Literary' frequently pre-curses the book's description. For instance a romance, crime or teen novel suddenly becomes literary romance, literary crime or literary teen fiction.

I know one extremely talented writer who's crime novel is a few character tweaks shy of being a very marketable read. She's been told 'no' by several agents, with the prognosis being the plot isn't commercial enough.

Except it is very commercial, just not on the traditional publishing stage she craves. I've offered to independently publish for her - she wants to hold out for an agent. Openly acknowledging it is the validation of a commercial book contract she is seeking. Whenever I discuss the type of book she has written and the kind of agent she might attract, invariably the word 'literary' pops up quickly and often.

My friend's novel is about a jaded female detective, struggling with the break-up of her marriage, cyber-crime and some clever burglars. It is an extremely good read but as Wikipedia tells us, good writing isn't necessarily literary fiction.

Literary fiction tends to be more about the character's introspective experience, the focus on the inner journey over plot, the goal to create emotional involvement in the reader.

The term 'literary' invokes in our minds the great writers, so I can understand why people like to associate their writing with the word. Even more so if they are good at writing. But to write well does not presume literary content.

Branding is important. Is anyone ever impressed by a product that promises one thing and delivers something else? Can you imagine any literary agent would be?

If validation is the goal, I offer there's none better than a satisfied reader. If commercial validation is a must have, then make sure the pitch isn't misrepresenting the product.

Saturday, 8 September 2012

Paid for reviews

For the record.

Amazon offer a service that's been in place for at least three years. If you have a product you want reviewed then you pay Amazon a set fee of several hundred pound/dollars. You also supply Amazon free review copies of your product, often books or technology. They will then send the product for free to select reviewers who will read or use it and write a review. If the reviewers don't write reviews they don't get more free products. Simples. There is no guarantee on the quality of the review or of the rating although being a reviewer is by invitation only. The program is called Amazon Vine and reviewers get a badge displayed with their name above all reviews they post, an indication of status within the reviewing community. I've been a Vine reviewer for three years. I have shelves of free books and boxes of seldom used gadgets. Occasionally you discover something that stays with you forever, as I did with Mathilda Savitch.

That's paid for reviews. It's not evil.

It is not perfect either. A reviewer may not like a big publisher's next great thing and end up with a legion of pseudo Amazon accounts disliking their review and lowering its standing. Other Vine reviewers sometimes dislike your review to get theirs higher in the listings and get more votes. Amazon have changed their whole ranking system to try and reward honest reviews and intent. Wherever you go though, there are people who for some reason are hellbent on manipulating outcomes. I guess that's just the diversity of humanity.

As an independent author I don't currently have the budget for a paid review service, but it is something I may consider down the line when launching a book. I'm not sure I'll ever be in a position to pay Amazon Vine. Whoever I chose I would carefully consider their standing and the service and how it's presented. I consider myself to be mostly moral and honourable. I don't consider paying for a professional review service to be immoral. I whole heartedly believe the best way to avoid bad reviews and the need to manipulate review outcomes, is to create something that's good in the first place.